Friday 9 September 2011

9.9.11 Red or Black

Red-faced (can't say black-faced as that would be un-PC) executives and producers let Nathan Hageman on to the TV show, even though they knew he had done time for assault.  So, they were fucking idiots for not thinking ahead that there was a chance of a kerfuffle should he win.  It turns out though that they mistakenly assumed his victim had been a man, when in fact he got 5 years (and served two and a half) for a savage assault on a woman.

A "source" from Red or Black said "We are kicking ourselves.  We spoke to him about his crime, but it never came up that it was a woman".

Oh, so it's would have been okay then if he'd kicked shit out of a MAN then!?

The CIC are thick, useless, sexist and totally unqualified to be working on a show that rewards people with £1M if they are lucky enough to be left at the end on a series of 50:50 chances of success.  The absolute disgrace is that the assumption of his attack being on a male meant he was allowed to participate, with producers thinking that was okay.  Mr Hageman might well be a totally undesirable individual who deserves a battering himself, but I suggest that the people who organise these things for ITV should change vocation - perhaps moving into politics, where uselessness, oversights, fuck-ups and idiotic cuntishness all prevail.

NB: CIC, as regular readers will know, means Cunts In Charge

...

No comments:

Post a Comment