Saturday, 26 October 2013
26.10.13 Lotto Winners & Other News
Does the above photo in any way capture the excitement one might expect at having each won £125,000? 'Not quite' would be an understatement. This group of glum-looking individuals consists of 5 of the 12 in a syndicate which won on the National Lottery, and I cannot think of a more pointless and drab photo. If the five are 'posing' at the request of the photographer, to look glum on purpose, then they are surely idiots. If they are looking this way through choice, then that's even worse. The 'problem' is that a mistake by Camelot meant they had initially thought the prize they would each win was £160,000, and so rather than winning £125k, they are miffed at having 'lost' £35k. All about perspective, eh?
In the Kitchen
At last it's finished. However, as soon as one cookery programme finishes, another starts. Some contestants are such 'hard work' to put up with, it's a turn off. The OTT approach to 'feeding' us with lame television is now out of all control, and disproportionate in the TV schedules. I vote for a final series in which cunts are locked in a kitchen and then left to their own devices, with no review of the results. It will be called Cook Off, Bake Off, Fuck Off !
Alex Ferguson
Will you please shut up and fuck off. Your views and pathetic attempts to whip up a storm while selling more books are not wanted; it's not all about you. Hearing what you've got to say on anything is only one tiny notch above hearing what the ghastly Cherie Blair has to say on any subject.
Collective Nouns
Yet more developments in the investigations of underhandedness by certain male celebrities, as Stuart Hall is under the spotlight again. We've all heard of a 'Murder of Crows' and a 'Pride of Lions'. I wonder will police establish while interviewing Stuart Hall that his own contribution to the language has been a "Touch of Indecent Assault".
No Holding Back
Meanwhile, Amanda Holden gets in on the act while publicising her latest book. It seems that Jimmy Savile asked her (while she was in Leeds General Infirmary) if she had a gynaecological problem before offering to "give her one". To suggest that this was JS trying to "seduce her" is rather pathetic. Shut up Amanda; you do very little for a lot of money and surely don't need to try and find a lower level on which to operate?
...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment