Are you trying to prove a point or what? Yes, yes, we know you're the man in charge (why, I haven't got a fucking clue!) and that you're entitled to pick the team you think is appropriate. However, I suggest that you're a twat whose ego has been aggravated, and as a result it falls to you to make a point. To decide at this very late stage that David Beckham is not to be included in the squad is pathetic.
I don't have any axe to grind in terms of favouring Beckham, who hardly has to struggle for attention or adulation. However, he's done so much more than anyone (including you, Stuart) to land GB with some decent attention, and the Olympic Games itself. After all the build up, it seems rather churlish and girlish to omit him for no good reason.
Looking at the players over the age of 23 who have stopped Beckham's inclusion is an eye-opener. Micah Richards? Are you having a cunting laugh? This is bollocks of the highest order. As I say, I have no bias that dictates Beckham has to be included, BUT - explain yourself, Mr Pearce! Micah Richards can't get into the England team (a team that's actually as dire as fucking fuck!) and you decide that he can somehow be deemed a better option (?) and all I can say is there's some shit going down here. Pointless, arrogant, twattish and sad. I say again, by way of a question that is the most demanding of 2012 to date: Micah Richards ???????????????????????
Cuntin crap! Psycho!
...
No comments:
Post a Comment