I was amazed by the recent tactics at Morrisons. Supermarkets are a law unto themselves, and con the fuck out of us on a regular basis. No, I am not this time talking about the variations in pack size/weight, or the creative ways in which they display items, or don't even make certain products or brands available. I am this time logging a very simple issue - the unwarranted cuntin' price hike.
I thought that the Sainsbury's increase in the cost of its most basic toilet roll from 51p to 70p at my local store was bad enough, equating to an increase in a month of 37%. But no, what takes the biscuit (or in this case the pasta) is the Morrisons hike of the year! On Saturday 27th August, I purchased the own-brand pasta at 17p.
On Friday 2nd September, just six days later, it had risen to a new selling price of 41p. That's a shocking 141% rise in less than a week. What the fucking fuck?
...
Sunday, 4 September 2011
Saturday, 3 September 2011
3.9.11 X-Factor Week 3
Well, another 60 minutes (less time for the adverts, trailers, padding, intros etc - so 41 minutes then) of hopefuls wailing for the judges. Not a fantastically notable instalment, but here are a few comments on the show:
...
- Louis raises the stakes early on with his decision of "I'm a million percent YES"
- Louis later settles for avoiding numbers with "An absolute absolute massive NO"
- "You're absolutely fantastic" 'said Thomas'. The first bit was Gary Barlow, the second bit was me (real time, sat next to Mrs MWSC, impersonating the narrator of Thomas the Tank Engine).
- The 'Michael Jackson' from last year was crap, and accused the judges of being judgemental (!) whilst continuing to whinge and displaying an attitude that was certainly capitalising on the 'mental' part.
- Luke Lucas was very good, but I had Mrs MWSC in stitches with my uncalled for comment. The camera showed his family back stage, and the mother who had a fantastically large set of gnashers. The cause of the stitches was my "She could outbite a camel". Not PC, but honest.
...
3.9.11 Cherie Blair QC
What does QC stand for? No, I am not referring to the 'Sherry' (forced to be renamed as 'British Fortified Wine' because of EU legislation) that was popular in the 70s and goes by these initials, but the other 'Cherie', the much more nauseating one - who's never been popular since the 70s. I certainly know what the 'C' stands for.
It seems she's been reprimanded (again) for being fucking useless and completely out of touch with reality. I appreciate that this is not news, because anyone who's been alive for the last twenty years will have had ample opportunity to deduce that the Ex-PM's wife is a self-serving appendage. In fact, the Blairs seem to be doing quite well for themselves, having shafted the country, and then led it to the doors of the abattoir [for Gordon Brown to knock and be let in]. So, we are left in the mess that will cripple the UK for ever, but the Blairs do all right. Cherie's latest fuck-up relates to the chap who was caught with cocaine worth £145,000 but was let off with a suspended sentence. It's been reported that three Appeal Court judges expressed astonishment at what was described as a startling, deficient and unduly lenient sentence. They fortunately did the right thing, and sentenced the bloke to three-and-a-half years in jail - still below the typical 5-9 years for 'conspiracy to supply a class A drug'. How on earth the QC decided upon a 12-month suspended sentence is beyond anyone.
It's all very well to 'reassess the case and re-sentence the guilty man', but what about the fuck-up by Cherie? Where's the penalty for this mess? Is she to be sacked? She's already had one correction applied to her work as a judge, when last year a man before her was convicted of breaking the jaw of a chap who was in a bank queue, but the twat let him off because he was supposedly "religious"!!!!
CB the QC is an RC [Right or Real, take your pick]
...
It seems she's been reprimanded (again) for being fucking useless and completely out of touch with reality. I appreciate that this is not news, because anyone who's been alive for the last twenty years will have had ample opportunity to deduce that the Ex-PM's wife is a self-serving appendage. In fact, the Blairs seem to be doing quite well for themselves, having shafted the country, and then led it to the doors of the abattoir [for Gordon Brown to knock and be let in]. So, we are left in the mess that will cripple the UK for ever, but the Blairs do all right. Cherie's latest fuck-up relates to the chap who was caught with cocaine worth £145,000 but was let off with a suspended sentence. It's been reported that three Appeal Court judges expressed astonishment at what was described as a startling, deficient and unduly lenient sentence. They fortunately did the right thing, and sentenced the bloke to three-and-a-half years in jail - still below the typical 5-9 years for 'conspiracy to supply a class A drug'. How on earth the QC decided upon a 12-month suspended sentence is beyond anyone.
It's all very well to 'reassess the case and re-sentence the guilty man', but what about the fuck-up by Cherie? Where's the penalty for this mess? Is she to be sacked? She's already had one correction applied to her work as a judge, when last year a man before her was convicted of breaking the jaw of a chap who was in a bank queue, but the twat let him off because he was supposedly "religious"!!!!
CB the QC is an RC [Right or Real, take your pick]
...
Friday, 2 September 2011
2.9.11 Soap TV
Why are we inundated with programmes that insist we're 'entertained' by anything and everything done by soap stars? Celebrity this, All Star that, and Soap Version the other. There's no end to the supply of soap actors, ex-soap people and 'peripheral' soap stars who seem intent on filling my TV screen. So many people desperate for more TV exposure, competing in various challenges that are commonly shit.
I struggle to endure 'Fiz' at the best of times, during an episode of Coronation Street. There are scores of other people of less renown who are wheeled in by programme makers, who somehow think we'll be dying to watch if it includes a cow from Emmerdale, or a cunt from Hollyoaks! I certainly don't want to put up with actors (if that's what they are) cooking, or on a quiz show, or Who Wants To Be A Pain-in-the-arse. They sing, chat, cook, eat, attempt obstacle courses, jump out of planes, open envelopes, play games, just about anything really. Usually 'for charity'. Yawn.
...
I struggle to endure 'Fiz' at the best of times, during an episode of Coronation Street. There are scores of other people of less renown who are wheeled in by programme makers, who somehow think we'll be dying to watch if it includes a cow from Emmerdale, or a cunt from Hollyoaks! I certainly don't want to put up with actors (if that's what they are) cooking, or on a quiz show, or Who Wants To Be A Pain-in-the-arse. They sing, chat, cook, eat, attempt obstacle courses, jump out of planes, open envelopes, play games, just about anything really. Usually 'for charity'. Yawn.
...
2.9.11 Un-Cooperative
Which queue to join is a question many of us ask ourselves on a regular basis. I had to make such a choice today, at the Co-op. The extent of my intended expenditure was just 30 pence, for a newspaper. In the 'old days', it was possible to nip in for such an item, and pay at the 'kiosk', without a significant wait. These days, there's no such option. The main reason is that the tills that used to serve such a purpose are now no different from normal tills, in that customers with full baskets can join the queue. Further, the range of services at that till now includes lottery tickets, scratchcards, Paypoint (for TV Licences, mobile phone top-ups, utility bill payments) plus cigarettes and spirits behind the till operator. The kiosk has two tills, but a greater potential for diverse requests from shoppers. The ordinary till is less flexible, but attracts old biddies with a trolley full of overpriced items - and these shoppers are slow or disorganised or both.
My choice was between one functioning till at the kiosk with a queue of three people (including one with a basket of goods being presented by an elderly man) versus an ordinary checkout with the 'tail-end' of one shopper's transaction about to be followed by an old lady with loads of stuff in a small trolley.
NB: This real-life conundrum would be of much greater relevance for GCSE Maths, rather than the more standard 'men digging a trench' question, or a more likely standard of question these days, 'What's one plus two? Tip - the answer rhymes with 'Tree' - unless you're Irish, in which case that's actually the answer.'
I discarded the third option, which was dumping thirty pence on the counter and walking off, and the hoo-hah that would have ensued. I joined the kiosk queue, having weighed up the merits of each and concluded that the speed of progress was likely to be marginally better on that channel. Meanwhile, I was able to delight in the complete fucking madness at the Co-op.
Only two people were serving customers. A supervisor was to my right, all of a sudden, laden with goods plastered with orange barcode stickers (reduced items) and putting them into a small trolley next to the kiosk. This was no doubt an attempt to entice loiterers to pick up a last minute 'bargain', or buy items for something like their proper price, after the Co-op's attempt at extortion had failed. My own suggestion would have been to put more fucking operators on the tills each week, and fewer items would have to be discounted just before their 'best before' date arrived. The time it takes to buy stuff contributes to it not leaving the shelves quickly enough. The main factor of course is that the shop is useless and the staff generally incompetent. While all sorts of stuff was tipped into the trolley to my right, ahead of me stood Rita, donning a pink T-shirt over her Co-op top. She stood in front of a small trestle table, which had odds and sods spread upon it - each with a raffle ticket taped in place. I mused that more stuff was likely to leave the building with a sticker on it than without. Rita was raising money for charity - which one I have no idea - and was asking anyone within range if he or she wanted 5 tickets for a pound. All I wanted was to see her shut the fuck up, take off the T-shirt and get behind the other till in the kiosk. A couple of other uniformed Co-op workers appeared, but one was buying a salad for herself and joined the queue behind the lady with the trolley, and the other chap just looked shifty and disappeared.
I got to the till, had a quick exchange with M (the only useful and likeable member of staff) and paid for my paper. I did highlight the lunacy of staff being available to sell raffle tickets, while she (M) was stuck on the till serving a permanent queue. A nod and agreement later, I was asked by Rita if I wanted to buy some raffle tickets. I was thus presented with choice for the second time today, and had to consider what to do:
...
My choice was between one functioning till at the kiosk with a queue of three people (including one with a basket of goods being presented by an elderly man) versus an ordinary checkout with the 'tail-end' of one shopper's transaction about to be followed by an old lady with loads of stuff in a small trolley.
NB: This real-life conundrum would be of much greater relevance for GCSE Maths, rather than the more standard 'men digging a trench' question, or a more likely standard of question these days, 'What's one plus two? Tip - the answer rhymes with 'Tree' - unless you're Irish, in which case that's actually the answer.'
I discarded the third option, which was dumping thirty pence on the counter and walking off, and the hoo-hah that would have ensued. I joined the kiosk queue, having weighed up the merits of each and concluded that the speed of progress was likely to be marginally better on that channel. Meanwhile, I was able to delight in the complete fucking madness at the Co-op.
Only two people were serving customers. A supervisor was to my right, all of a sudden, laden with goods plastered with orange barcode stickers (reduced items) and putting them into a small trolley next to the kiosk. This was no doubt an attempt to entice loiterers to pick up a last minute 'bargain', or buy items for something like their proper price, after the Co-op's attempt at extortion had failed. My own suggestion would have been to put more fucking operators on the tills each week, and fewer items would have to be discounted just before their 'best before' date arrived. The time it takes to buy stuff contributes to it not leaving the shelves quickly enough. The main factor of course is that the shop is useless and the staff generally incompetent. While all sorts of stuff was tipped into the trolley to my right, ahead of me stood Rita, donning a pink T-shirt over her Co-op top. She stood in front of a small trestle table, which had odds and sods spread upon it - each with a raffle ticket taped in place. I mused that more stuff was likely to leave the building with a sticker on it than without. Rita was raising money for charity - which one I have no idea - and was asking anyone within range if he or she wanted 5 tickets for a pound. All I wanted was to see her shut the fuck up, take off the T-shirt and get behind the other till in the kiosk. A couple of other uniformed Co-op workers appeared, but one was buying a salad for herself and joined the queue behind the lady with the trolley, and the other chap just looked shifty and disappeared.
I got to the till, had a quick exchange with M (the only useful and likeable member of staff) and paid for my paper. I did highlight the lunacy of staff being available to sell raffle tickets, while she (M) was stuck on the till serving a permanent queue. A nod and agreement later, I was asked by Rita if I wanted to buy some raffle tickets. I was thus presented with choice for the second time today, and had to consider what to do:
- Say 'Yes' and spend a pound to win fuck all of any use from the trestle table of oddments
- Say 'No' and walk on by
- Say 'Yes' but get my own back by asking the little itch to make it a "plus five" which would have perplexed her and been impossible to offer
- Say nothing, give a disdainful look with a very subtle shake of the head, and walk on by
- Say 'Fuck off you stupid little cunt, I would have been out of here five minutes ago if you stopped pissing about and annoying customers with a crappy offer of raffle tickets for in-store shit that is of no interest. So why don't you stop blocking the exit, take off that T-shirt and do some fucking work because this shop is a complete joke.'
...
Thursday, 1 September 2011
1.9.11 August Quotes of the Month
1st Place - "Do you know what, even though I was in Cuba, the Tooth Fairy still found me" [Tia - aged 6, pleased with her pound coin]
2nd Place - "You used to get it from the chemist's after going to the doctor's" [Jess, referring to, of all things, Matey, which was of course a general purchase and not 'on prescription']
3rd Place - "It was like the top of a wine bottle" [Faye, to confirm the nature of a bathroom mat after it was suggested it was made of cork rather than vinyl]
4th Place - "She clearly doesn't throw up anymore" [Faye, referring to an acquaintance who was once very fat but at the last sighting was very skinny]
...
2nd Place - "You used to get it from the chemist's after going to the doctor's" [Jess, referring to, of all things, Matey, which was of course a general purchase and not 'on prescription']
3rd Place - "It was like the top of a wine bottle" [Faye, to confirm the nature of a bathroom mat after it was suggested it was made of cork rather than vinyl]
4th Place - "She clearly doesn't throw up anymore" [Faye, referring to an acquaintance who was once very fat but at the last sighting was very skinny]
...
1.9.11 Hospital 2
Day two of two, at the local hospital was a source of further bafflement and observations. Generally, people were helpful and I should go on record to commend the staff. Except the guy that asked if he could help me, when I arrived at the Acute Assessment Unit. He was of course 'teasing', as he proceeded to give no help whatsoever. Instead, after I mentioned we (TMWSC Junior was with me) were there to see Mrs MWSC, he said to wait, and he'd check things out. After almost half an hour, and the greatest exertion of tolerance mixed with patience (sorry for the pun) that TMWSC has ever exercised, it was enough. I entered the ward and loitered by the station. No trains came along, but there were many nurses hanging around. I adopted a certain stance/look and waited. It took a full minute before one of the twelve or so people noticed me and decided she might be able to help. These were not her exact words, and I was thankful for that because having been asked "Can I help you?" once already by a geezer whose mission did not actually include helping, I'd have been somewhat dubious of that line. "Is someone seeing to you?" was the more targeted question. My "No" led to her attending to my query as to the whereabouts of Mrs MWSC [not of course the name entered in the hospital records]. Ward 32. After receiving vague directions, Junior and I set off.
After finding the ward with marginally less success than would have been achieved by a rat searching for cheese in a model of the hospital, we entered it some five minutes later. Mrs MWSC was lying on her bed in the bay at the very end, the other side of four women who occupied the central (in the fucking way) area, having a chat as though they were in a Tesco aisle. I held my hands apart in a 'Moses' manner, and there was a parting as a pair moved back on each side. Mrs MWSC was dressed, ready to leave, but had first to complete one more test. We waited.
Two of the four shuffled off, so we were then left to listen to the verbal exchange of fat patient number one with gossip number two. I actually think Joyce from yesterday was preferable to these two! The fat one was the worst. In the interests of brevity (and sanity) I will save you, reader, from the rubbish this woman spouted. One thing I won't forget, though, was her recounting of an experience with a charity shop. She saw a child's toy in the shop marked at £10, and went to the assistant, offering to buy it for £7. It came as no surprise to me to hear her say her offer was not accepted. She, however, was affronted, and left the shop empty handed - probably as empty handed as if she'd offered £7,000 to a garage for a Mini costing £10,000. It turns out that a few days later, she saw the same toy in the window, marked down to £7 in a 'sale'. She marched into the shop and took issue with the assistant. She recounted her efforts to secure the item for £7 a few days earlier, and being told that it couldn't be discounted. She wanted to know why it was now on sale for £7. I was in fact quite curious to learn where this was going. The assistant apparently confirmed that it was not selling at the higher price so after a review, it had been re-priced at a more appropriate level.
Now, at this stage I was expecting Mrs Pain-in-the-arse to secure the item for the £7 and be on her way. But no, I heard her continue with the story and explain that she suggested that she should have been given the item for £7 in the first place, especially as "it's all profit, because you don't have to pay for anything you sell". It was apparently for this reason she'd haggled and thought it totally reasonable to expect a bit of flexibility. Then, the amazing development was revealed.
"So I said to her: 'You should have taken the £7 which was the right price; no idiot would have paid £10 anyway,' and she didn't have much to say about that. Anyway, I'd said my piece, and so I offered her £5 for it."
What the fuck? This woman seems to make a habit of haggling with charity shops, and challenging them on their approach, sales strategy and margins. Unfortunately (not that I am a fan of charity shops) they do actually have some expenses, but when one goes into a charity shop, the idea is that there's some minor fucking intent to support the charity in question; not haggle like a cunt to knock two quid off a Fisher-Price toy! The absolute cheek of her, trying to beat them down again. If I were the assistant, my response would have been:
"Fuck off to Mothercare, you stupid old bat, and buy a new one for £25"
She'd exhausted herself with all this yapping, and hinted to her audience of one that she needed a snooze - thank God. A few minutes later, we moved to the 'Day Room' and then Mrs MWSC had the final test sorted before we were ready to leave. On the notice board, I noticed [that shows it works then!] a sign that confused me.
How does one "Deliver same-sex accommodation"? It was one of those useless, pointless, self-congratulatory signs that simply wastes money and takes up space unnecessarily. Then, I was about to proceed when a further issue cropped up when I noticed a notice just below it:
What exactly is a "Discharge Clinic" then? It sounds rather disgusting to me! Also, the notice says (by default) you can go home/escape on a Monday, Wednesday or Thursday. Odd.
...
After finding the ward with marginally less success than would have been achieved by a rat searching for cheese in a model of the hospital, we entered it some five minutes later. Mrs MWSC was lying on her bed in the bay at the very end, the other side of four women who occupied the central (in the fucking way) area, having a chat as though they were in a Tesco aisle. I held my hands apart in a 'Moses' manner, and there was a parting as a pair moved back on each side. Mrs MWSC was dressed, ready to leave, but had first to complete one more test. We waited.
Two of the four shuffled off, so we were then left to listen to the verbal exchange of fat patient number one with gossip number two. I actually think Joyce from yesterday was preferable to these two! The fat one was the worst. In the interests of brevity (and sanity) I will save you, reader, from the rubbish this woman spouted. One thing I won't forget, though, was her recounting of an experience with a charity shop. She saw a child's toy in the shop marked at £10, and went to the assistant, offering to buy it for £7. It came as no surprise to me to hear her say her offer was not accepted. She, however, was affronted, and left the shop empty handed - probably as empty handed as if she'd offered £7,000 to a garage for a Mini costing £10,000. It turns out that a few days later, she saw the same toy in the window, marked down to £7 in a 'sale'. She marched into the shop and took issue with the assistant. She recounted her efforts to secure the item for £7 a few days earlier, and being told that it couldn't be discounted. She wanted to know why it was now on sale for £7. I was in fact quite curious to learn where this was going. The assistant apparently confirmed that it was not selling at the higher price so after a review, it had been re-priced at a more appropriate level.
Now, at this stage I was expecting Mrs Pain-in-the-arse to secure the item for the £7 and be on her way. But no, I heard her continue with the story and explain that she suggested that she should have been given the item for £7 in the first place, especially as "it's all profit, because you don't have to pay for anything you sell". It was apparently for this reason she'd haggled and thought it totally reasonable to expect a bit of flexibility. Then, the amazing development was revealed.
"So I said to her: 'You should have taken the £7 which was the right price; no idiot would have paid £10 anyway,' and she didn't have much to say about that. Anyway, I'd said my piece, and so I offered her £5 for it."
What the fuck? This woman seems to make a habit of haggling with charity shops, and challenging them on their approach, sales strategy and margins. Unfortunately (not that I am a fan of charity shops) they do actually have some expenses, but when one goes into a charity shop, the idea is that there's some minor fucking intent to support the charity in question; not haggle like a cunt to knock two quid off a Fisher-Price toy! The absolute cheek of her, trying to beat them down again. If I were the assistant, my response would have been:
"Fuck off to Mothercare, you stupid old bat, and buy a new one for £25"
She'd exhausted herself with all this yapping, and hinted to her audience of one that she needed a snooze - thank God. A few minutes later, we moved to the 'Day Room' and then Mrs MWSC had the final test sorted before we were ready to leave. On the notice board, I noticed [that shows it works then!] a sign that confused me.
How does one "Deliver same-sex accommodation"? It was one of those useless, pointless, self-congratulatory signs that simply wastes money and takes up space unnecessarily. Then, I was about to proceed when a further issue cropped up when I noticed a notice just below it:
What exactly is a "Discharge Clinic" then? It sounds rather disgusting to me! Also, the notice says (by default) you can go home/escape on a Monday, Wednesday or Thursday. Odd.
...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


