Sunday, 28 February 2016
28.2.16 Cheryl Has One Direction
It seems there is no end to Cheryl's bed-hopping, and name changing. Her one direction is the next bloke. I wonder who is next on the growing list of Mrs/Miss/Ms Cheryl-Cole-Tweedy-Fernandez-Versini-Payne [CCTFVP].
When CCTV dispensed with 'Tweedy', she hung on to 'Cole' for dear life, despite ejecting the oddly-behaved Ashley Cole. His name was seemingly more attractive than the bloke himself.
Jean-Bernard Fernandez-Versini had, in Cheryl's view, a name to die for, and so it was that they married somewhere-or-other. Thus, uPVC inflicted upon us the mouthful that further encouraged us all to simply refer to her (if we had to) as 'Cheryl'.
Rihanna, Beyonce, Madonna, Lorde, to name but a few, don't need a second name. Cheryl, on the other hand, is expecting us all to use a fucking Rolodex to contain her numerous entries.
Sadly not all of the One Direction chaps can find love as openly. H&L are obviously having to delay their public launch. I suspect they wish they could go back to their earlier days.
Oh well, I am sure they will come clean at some point. For now, I have enough to amuse myself with, as TCP snuggles up with Liam for lovey-dovey pics on social media.
...
28.2.16 Weather Bollocks
Generally a quiet picture
Rain slipping its way into northern England
Some punchy old showers
One or two spits and spots of rain
Fresh temperatures
Top temperatures are mild, 16 or 17
The weather will be trundling along
Rain is set to trundle its way north
Sleety snow
Pesky showers
Rain knocking on the door
Showers turning wintry
Some winteriness on the hills
These are all quotes or extracts from weather forecasts, in which presenters talk bollocks, and display no competence in English let alone meteorology.
...
Saturday, 27 February 2016
27.2.16 Begging Charts
Unfortunately things have got out of hand. There are of course many worthy causes for which money might be raised, and I have little doubt that there are multiple charities already in existence for each and every cause you may come up with. With 165,000 registered charities in the UK, the word 'Charity' is no longer a useful term in any regard at all. Someone doing something good for charity is not necessarily a useful undertaking these days, nor is it necessarily as charitable as you might at first think.
The vast majority of 'charities' are in fact little more than entities wanting a tax break, displaying a minimal basis of attempting something good or useful as a qualification for their status. The uncontrolled expansion of the market is nuts, and unlike the world of business and commerce, charities preserve themselves ahead of any thought for the cause. Where are the mergers? Where is the cost-saving in the charity world?
Anyway, the big ones are now intent on treating donations as transactions, with no focus on the fund raising tactics other than 'playing the numbers'. This is evidenced so well by the TV adverts, which of course cost a fortune. I personally have little desire to encourage them to fritter a fortune on adverts which are seemingly justified as soon as the charity concerned gets a penny more than the outlay on them. Ludicrous. This is similar to someone wanting to raise money for saving the Lesser Spotted Guacamole via sponsorship, but the cost of the trip to Peru has to be taken out of the money raised. Basically, pay for someone's holiday!
The government need to revisit the charitable benefits regime, and encourage some consolidation in the sector. Cost savings through mergers would reduce wastage massively, and there would be much more going to the good causes. As things stand, it's a fucking farce. They are all competing with each other to vie for our money, instead of there being a combined effort to improve the percentage of money that is available actually going to do good, rather than simply pay for offices, staff, cars, visits and numerous jobs. This 'big business' then gets breaks to clutter high streets with stores, which are staffed by volunteers.
I suggest that if there are, say, 50 charities for a cause, then there are probably 50 sets of offices, photocopiers, phone systems, stationery cupboards, etc. If there were a single entity for that good cause, then I guarantee less would be wasted on running costs. The whole thing is a mess.
The real disgrace is the uncontrolled use of the word 'Charity'. These are businesses!
Of the adverts touting good causes, some want a lot, some less but on a rolling basis. Anyway, here are some of the adverts that of course need to be paid for by your DD or text.
Salvation Army - £19.00
Dogs Trust - £5.00
Childline - £5.00
Wateraid - £2.00 per month
Samaritans - £5.00
Save the Children - £2.00 per month
Macmillan - £5.00
Unicef - £3.00
Blue Cross For Pets - £5.00
British Heart Foundation - £3.00 per month
Great Ormond Street Hospital - £3.00 per month
NSPCC - £3.00 per month
Sponsor a Donkey Sanctuary - £2.00 per month
Actionaid - £5.00
Guide Dogs For The Blind - £1 per week to 'sponsor a puppy'
...
Saturday, 6 February 2016
6.2.16 ASDA - End of the Line
At the end of the end aisle, there is an assortment of items that have come to the end of their life. None of the items is actually beyond its sell by date, but all of them are clearly "end of line" items. I had pushed the trolley around the boring route, reaching at the far end of the store the oddments that made up the weird selection, and noted the red and white stickers affixed to each item. On the bottom shelf of the three I clocked some brandy.
Offer of the Day
I considered that I might like to acquire the bottle, that came with a nice tube. I inspected the sticker to establish the level of the price reduction, and was instantly left standing aghast. The cunt with the price gun was clearly a fucking pacifist.
WAS: £10.00
NOW £9.90
...
Sunday, 31 January 2016
31.1.16 Seven Syllables From Asda
Once upon a time it was simple fact that getting past the checkout operator with any ‘contraband’ was nigh on impossible. At the whiff of there being a tube of glue in a minor’s basket, Valerie would wave to Shirley, the Supervisor, and the secret service would arrive carrying an orange jumpsuit for the offender. Similar treatment was afforded to anyone under eighteen attempting to purchase anything serrated.
Then there was the relentless risk that a fourteen-year-old shopper might get past the till with a certificate 15 DVD, and manage to get a wholly inappropriate flash of a naked crotch and the odd mention of “fuck”. Vigilance at the checkout prevailed, irrespective of the fact that the teenager’s online viewing gave him a whole lot more than sight of a cunt, and in all likelihood there were even-odds that he'd already had his first taste of a cunt first hand! Finally, there was the chance that without checkout scrutiny at the highest level, someone under 18 might sneak past with something containing alcohol in greater concentration than found in Maynard’s Wine Gums.
All this has changed now. The threat to civilisation no longer comes from Alcohol, and the era of the alcopop-downing teenager is long gone. This became clear to me today, as I was served proof during a stop at ASDA. Society is under such threat that the focus of all attention at the checkouts is now:
carrier bags !
I no longer have to provide details of my day and my well-being to a nosy cunt who prods inanely before doing his or her job. Nor do I have to provide confirmation that I am not a quadriplegic, via the recently downgraded checkout vetting and interrogation that in all cases included by way of introduction - “Are you okay with your packing?” Instead, the attention has been diverted to the existence or not of the means to take the fucking shopping from the premises.
Yes, reader, the obsession in today’s society is cunting carrier bags. Have I got them, do I need any more, what sort might I want, how much might they cost. But worse than that, the fucking machines in the self-service area of ASDA, if today’s evidence is anything to go by, are more fucking demanding than the humans.
I had five items, one of which was a box containing cans of lager. I kicked off proceedings by scanning the box, and setting it down in the bagging area to the left. I had to confirm I had a bag of my own, as I’d no intention of buying a bag. (The question was of course pointless anyway, because the shitty bags would hardly manage a fucking crate of lager.) I tapped the screen to say ‘No’ to wanting a bag, and this meant a screen message stating operator assistance was required to "verify". What the cunting fuck! I waited in the umbra of a flashing red light while a uniformed ‘assistant’ worked her way over to assist. The assistance was NOT to check I was an appropriate purchaser of alcohol, but to make sure I’d not fucked up the whole bag bollocks. She swiped and tapped, and then muttered that I would have to scan it again.
I scanned the cunting lager and set it down, and then proceeded to scan the other four items (none of which fell into the categories of glue, porn, serrated equipment, full fat milk, peanuts or firearms) fully expecting to make payment without interruption. However, once more I was unable to do anything without the further intervention of an ASDA employee.
After tapping the screen and swiping her card, I was free to move on and exit the store – free to sell cigarettes to minors and offer glue as smelling salts, scatter peanuts at those susceptible to anaphylactic shock, and generally stab anything that moves with either a steak knife or a wallpaper scraper. I could also, of course, offer up to 20 kids some Carlsberg in a can.
Still, none of that really matters. The main thing is that the bag policy at ASDA was preserved, and the one assistant in the self-service area [that being the area where it is actually impossible to serve yourself because intervention is needed at least once for every customer] was able to feel useful. I was not alone in helping her feel needed, as every cunt in the vicinity was silently screaming at the ludicrous machines, the delay, and the needless inconvenience. Meanwhile, she was looking harassed, harried, and hopeless; yet strangely, she was only mildly more animated than the machine. The main distinction between the two (no decision being possible in terms as helpfulness, as both were useless) was that the employee grunted seven syllableS at me.
"You'll have to scan it again."
The only saving grace in this experience was that these machines don’t fucking talk.
...
Saturday, 2 January 2016
2.1.16 Celebrity Mastermind Sucks
I have just seen what can only be properly described as "an apology of a cunting programme" called Celebrity Mastermind. The awful mess was presided over by the equally pompous, sanctimonious and rather twattish John Humphrys, who is a negative factor in ANY attempt to provide entertainment of any kind.
Bore
On to the programme's content - or complete cunting lack of it! Once upon a time, there was thought to be some kudos in appearing on the show, whether as a real competitor (with a brain) or as an entrant on the occasional celebrity version. However, these days it is clearly the BBC's policy to fuck up, and take the piss out of viewers.
This latest edition today saw us served with four non-celebrities. I have no idea who these people were/are. One had something to do with historical novels, one has something to do with children's entertainment, and one was in a mobility scooter. The fourth, a chap in a suit, was simply bland.
I caught the programme just before half-time. This allowed me to witness the scores after each had revealed his or her knowledge on a specialised subject. The scores were 8, 9, 10 and 11. This was not so awful, really, despite the fact that my neighbour's pet goldfish could have answered 20% of the questions posed! The real revelations regarding the dimness of the competitors (I REFUSE to refer to them with the 'C' word - and I don't mean 'cunt').
The rabble upped their scored, one and all, BUT by rather differing levels. The suited bloke went from 10 to 20, and the woman who wrote books went to a winning score of 21 from 11. All rather boring, eh? It was the other two twats that did my head in and wasted a portion of my life that I'll not be able to reclaim, or get compensation for. The kids' entertainer of dubious renown (and intelligence) tortured me on his journey from 8 points to 13, during a two-and-a-half minute ordeal, and I was dumbfounded at the level of fucking ignorance. This caused me to query the qualification for appearing on a show like this. Clearly the 'Celebrity' requirement was something all four of them failed to meet. On the intelligence stakes, even with the questions being of a generously pathetic nature (allowing most people of sofas around the country to fart the fucking answers out, let alone just get them right) these buffoons were diabolically informed. Generally, knowledge is acquired to a level whereby answering a few easy questions should not prove too problematic. However, this show proves that the BBC can find people whose awareness is below the average, and also in the lower quartile. What better candidates then, to put on a TV screen.
Is there positive discrimination at play, I wonder. YES, just HAS to be the answer. The scooter rider manager to take her score from 9 points up to 11 in the second round. That's right, two cunting points! WTF?
As for the awarding of a trophy, that was simply a preposterous finale to the lamest load of shite ever broadcast on BBC1 - and I include Eastenders.
Dire.
...
Wednesday, 30 December 2015
30.12.15 Gorilla Gawping
Who'd be a Rwandan gorilla, eh? Talk about a heavy schedule. These poor chaps are in such demand that they don't even get a break at Christmas. Someone at ITV has really fucked up this year. First the decision was made to let Steve Bishop loose in the jungle to gawp at gorillas. Second, the same cunt decided to let Griff Rhys Jones out of his cage to tell us that it will yet again be alright on the night.
The gorillas obviously had to check their Filofaxes to give Bishop a slot, because they most certainly have little respite from people all over the globe trotting to Rwanda, gnashing their teeth, and being desperate to endanger the endangered species. What with Joey Essex recently being pointed in the direction of some gorillas, I would have thought the primates would have banned UK visitors. Still, if every country is sending idiots, comedians, survival nobs and 'celebrities' to have a gawp, then the 365 days in the year must be well and truly spoken for.
It was probably a blessing for the Rwandan tribe to learn that the BBC had used its allotted time, what with Attenborough scratching around every year, and that Gordon Buchanan had booked with the Grauer Gorillas of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Still, at least he is a wildlife cameraman, rather than someone with no business bothering a chimp, let alone a gorilla. So, back to Bishop, then. He's a nice enough chap, even if he does speak at 1.3 mph, and labour every joke more than the warden in a fucking prison camp getting inmates to split rocks. There is no excuse, though, for sending a comedian to the jungle, when he opts not to be funny at all. The logic is nuts and the reasoning bananas. ITV may as well have sent Barbara Windsor - in fact, that would have been Jackpot Cunting Joy for all, surely? [Obviously with NO cameras and NO return ticket]
Tonight, Griff Rhys Jones will hog the ITV screen, causing more offence than Michael Bublé and his crooning, let alone the accented 'e'. Still, Bublé only seems to escape his bubble at Christmas, so perhaps I ought to be thankful. GRJ gets rather more (too much) exposure for my liking. He is basically as pointless as 2012 remake of the Spiderman film. Yesterday ITV showed The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) which added completely fuck-all to the 2002 original, and no doubt cost many millions to make.
Channel 5 has, for New Year's Day, lined up Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes. Sadly it has been "edited for blood and violence". This cautionary note is, I think, confirmation that the cunts have removed some of the original film, rather than put some extra portions in. This tampering is despicable, and wholly out of order.
On a final 'gorilla' note, I saw that Greg Wallace proved himself to be a twat on Masterchef - not that there was ever any doubt whatsoever.
...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











