2.2.12 John Terry Trial Farce

Fucking criminal!  No, I haven't even got to John Terry, yet.  I am talking about the 'decision' to postpone the trial until July.  WTF?  I rather think that anyone else calling someone a "Fucking Black Cunt" [sorry, I mean allegedly, as there is some dispute apparently, as to whether he said this or the oh-so-much-better "Fucking Blind Cunt"] would be dealt with rather more quickly and severely.

The fine, if he is eventually convicted, is one of "up to £2500" - a stupid level of punishment for someone who earns that much (pre-tax) in three hours!  What would be a whole lot more interesting is some inside knowledge of what the FA might decide to do if/when JT is found guilty.  Surely if Suarez is given an eight match ban, JT should be up for rather more, considering the overtness of the attack on Anton Ferdinand, caught on camera.

I don't give a donkey's cunt whether we suffer at the Euro Championships through JT being missing.  He is actually becoming a donkey, and to my mind is not now up to the job of stopping fast attackers - without nudging, kicking, holding and of course abusing, allegedly.  Should England take JT to Poland, and should England do well (I know, I know, fat chance) I would be disgusted that JT had been allowed to play a part in the tournament anyway.  What would the general view be if he contributed to a good result, and was found guilty of being a cunt afterwards?  That would make England's achievement look rather tarnished.  To have delayed on the basis that it would do harm to the national interests at the Euro Championships would be the most awful basis for postponement.  The FA could be judged hypocritical, if it can't deal properly with racism - something (again, allegedly) it wants to 'stamp out'.  It will be a travesty if JT takes his place in the team.  The only thing that would be worse is if he is allowed to be Captain.  That would really show the world we are not serious about punishing racism, and useless at making decisions: two-faced then.

...