Apparently many of the rioters have "tragic" lives, according to a Chief Constable. He has added:
"We need to show some compassion and be pragmatic about how we deal with these people."
Twat. Having a life which is allegedly (and subjectively) "tragic" is in no way an excuse for rioting and looting. Every single person in the riots knew full well that it was illegal to incite, commit acts of violence or vandalism, and to loot. How the fuck, then, does the top policeman in a constabulary come out with such a fuck-wit comment about those who have destroyed law and order on the streets that his officers were supposed to be protecting? Soft-centred, useless creature who surely demonstrates his inability to carry out his job in line with the expectations of the public.
On a tangential note, it seems that there's an outcry from some lefties and useless fuckers, to bemoan the plight of some whose sentences seem a bit harsh. I say quite simply: if you loot and/or riot, you are in no position to whinge. To those who protest on behalf of the guilty, get a fuckin' life that's got a dollop of something worthwhile in it, and leave the crooks to look after themselves. Finally, it's not the sentences for recently caught vandals, looters and rioters that are harsh - it's all the other sentences that are soft. So, a looter gets 18 months. Why does a shoplifter not get the same, or something approaching that? THAT is the real problem; we are too soft for 50 weeks of the year, and now are accused of over-reacting for the "riot fortnight". Bollocks.
...
No comments:
Post a Comment